We don't teach you to bypass detectors. We tell you if your content will survive the next Google Helpful Content Update.
Proprietary detection system that audits 29 AI patterns with per-category scoring. Real-time SEO risk prediction. Automatic cross-reference with your LLMO Score.
Humanizing to bypass detectors is not an SEO strategy.
Detectors and the Google algorithm measure different things. Optimizing for one does not protect you from the other.
What everyone does
- •Generate content with AI, run it through a "humanizer" and publish.
- •Bypass the detector but get penalized by Google anyway.
- •Bypassers train to avoid detection, not to improve quality.
What LLMFY Human-First Score does
- Detects the 29 patterns penalized by Google Helpful Content, not the ones bots detect.
- Tells you which to fix and which to keep (LLMO tension).
- Cross-references your LLMO Score: if both rise together, you're on track.
Everything you get in each analysis
Nine actionable outputs. No opaque scores, no generic recipes.
Score 0–100
Precise score, not just "AI" or "human".
29 audited patterns
Technical taxonomy with proprietary per-category scoring.
Literal instances
It doesn't just detect — it tells you exactly where and how to fix.
Prioritized action plan
Ordered by estimated point impact.
Humanize-vs-LLMO tensionUnique
What no competitor has: knowing which patterns would raise your human score but break your LLMO Score.
SEO risk prediction
Based on real Google Helpful Content signals.
Reference corpus
Compare against real human content from your niche.
LLMO cross-reference
If the URL already has an LLMO Score, it cross-references automatically.
PDF export
Full downloadable editorial report, ready to share.
How it compares with the rest of the market
Many tools detect AI. Only one prevents SEO penalties.
| Feature | LLMFY Human-First | Originality.ai | GPTZero | Undetectable.ai |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detects AI patterns | 29 patterns | Generic score | Generic score | Yes (to bypass) |
| Per-instance suggested fix | ||||
| Humanize-vs-LLMO tension⭐ | Unique | |||
| Google HCU risk prediction | ||||
| LLMO Score cross-reference | ||||
| Goal | Prevent SEO penalties | Detect AI | Detect AI | Bypass detectors |
| Who is it for | Professional SEOs | Editors | Teachers | Students |
Humanizing and optimizing for LLMs are not opposites. They are the same thing.
We applied Human-First Score to our own article /blog/guia-relevancia-semantica.
Initial LLMO Score
82/100
LLMO Score after fixes
88/100+6
The LLMO score went up at the same time the AI tells went down. The tension section told us which patterns to keep (inline-header lists, bold of technical definitions) and which to remove (intensifiers, negative parallelisms).
Frequently asked questions
Audit your first article
Get started with the Starter plan (50 credits for €49/mo). Each analysis costs 1 credit.